* Interviewing/assessment -- face-to-face interactions between specially trained personnel and the delinquent to review the offender's proof results.

* Interviewing/assessment -- face-to-face interactions between specially trained personnel and the delinquent to review the offender's proof results, further clarify the circumstances of the arrest, and identify family, medical, personal, or legal question s that may indicate a ne for treatment.

* Referral and monitoring -- referral of culprits for appropriate services, tracking their progres within the system, and assessing their compliance with court-mandated treatment.

Ninety percent of screening programs take a view ofed report that they use the pair in-person interviews and self-report questionnaires (Chang et al. 2002) The greatest in quantity commonly used standardized instruments in DWI screening programs are the Mortimer-Filkins (MF) experiment (Wendling and Kolody 1982), the Michigan Alcoholism Screening trial (MAST) (Selzer et al. 1971) and the Driver Risk Inventory (DRI). (2)

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING SCREENING IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE POPULATIONS

Limitations of general Screening Procedures

undivided factor limiting the effectiveness of existing screening procedures may be the use of screening instruments that are not designed to evaluate felons Most instruments, such as the commonly used MAST, were make knowned in populations other than DWI convicts or other criminal justice populations and were not designed specifically for use in court-mandated screening (Chang et al. 2002) Furthermore, it has been indicateed that screening in the criminal justice a whole should move beyond alcohol-specific measures to include misuse of other remedys and psychosocial factors that frequently coexist with alcohol abuse and interdependence For example, screening procedures should be able to reliably determine symptoms of other mix with drugs use and misuse, history of violent behavior, motivational factors, lifestyle factors, medical history, and psychiatric enigmas (Peters and Bartoi 1997). To date, no available instrument has demonstrated accuracy to disguise for both psychiatric problems and AOD misuse. Therefore, it may be useful to bring to maturity specialized mental health and AOD abuse screening instruments for evaluating criminal justice clients (Peter and Bartoi 1997)